<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Kent Sanders</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kentsanders.net/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kentsanders.net</link>
	<description>The art of life and worship</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 00:15:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Reflections on My 36th Birthday by Harold Wedel</title>
		<link>http://kentsanders.net/2010/07/26/reflections-on-my-36th-birthday/#comment-371</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Harold Wedel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 00:15:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kentsanders.net/?p=1351#comment-371</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Your blog on your 36th birthday was refreshing to me.  Your openness makes it easy for others to know how to &quot;grow up.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your blog on your 36th birthday was refreshing to me.  Your openness makes it easy for others to know how to &#8220;grow up.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Review of &#8220;The Noticer&#8221; by Andy Andrews by Alice Perrey</title>
		<link>http://kentsanders.net/2011/01/03/review-of-the-noticer-by-andy-andrews/#comment-370</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alice Perrey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 18:57:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kentsanders.net/?p=1373#comment-370</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I read the book also--and I paid for it--and hold many of the same opinions you do.  The situations were a little too fanciful and contrived for my taste; I found it hard to suspend disbelief and really get into the vignettes. That said, the author does make you think about how much we miss in our daily lives and how much more effective we could be if we would open our eyes and observe the people around us.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read the book also&#8211;and I paid for it&#8211;and hold many of the same opinions you do.  The situations were a little too fanciful and contrived for my taste; I found it hard to suspend disbelief and really get into the vignettes. That said, the author does make you think about how much we miss in our daily lives and how much more effective we could be if we would open our eyes and observe the people around us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Are You a Young or Old Earth Creationist? (Or Neither?) by Kent Sanders</title>
		<link>http://kentsanders.net/2009/02/17/are-you-a-young-or-old-earth-creationist-or-neither/#comment-347</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kent Sanders]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Nov 2010 15:39:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sacredstones.net/?p=497#comment-347</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Divinelogos - thanks for the comments.  I appreciate your stopping by my blog and checking it out!  Thanks also for the &quot;Starlight and Time&quot; recommendation - I&#039;ve put it on my Amazon wishlist.  I find your comments really interesting.  I don&#039;t have a hard and fast view either way (young or old earth).  What I am definitely committed to right now is that one way or another, the universe is the product of an intelligent, creative God.  How he chose to create it, I&#039;m not entire sure.  I believe in the truth of the Genesis account of creation - whether it is literal or figurative truth, I don&#039;t know for sure.  Many other parts of the Bible use figurative language (poetry, apocalypse, etc.).  That being said, I am open to wherever the evidence points, whether young or old earth.  

But you&#039;re definitely correct - neither viewpoint can be proven scientifically.  Whatever view you chose, they both demand faith on some level.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Divinelogos &#8211; thanks for the comments.  I appreciate your stopping by my blog and checking it out!  Thanks also for the &#8220;Starlight and Time&#8221; recommendation &#8211; I&#8217;ve put it on my Amazon wishlist.  I find your comments really interesting.  I don&#8217;t have a hard and fast view either way (young or old earth).  What I am definitely committed to right now is that one way or another, the universe is the product of an intelligent, creative God.  How he chose to create it, I&#8217;m not entire sure.  I believe in the truth of the Genesis account of creation &#8211; whether it is literal or figurative truth, I don&#8217;t know for sure.  Many other parts of the Bible use figurative language (poetry, apocalypse, etc.).  That being said, I am open to wherever the evidence points, whether young or old earth.  </p>
<p>But you&#8217;re definitely correct &#8211; neither viewpoint can be proven scientifically.  Whatever view you chose, they both demand faith on some level.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Are You a Young or Old Earth Creationist? (Or Neither?) by divinelogos</title>
		<link>http://kentsanders.net/2009/02/17/are-you-a-young-or-old-earth-creationist-or-neither/#comment-345</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[divinelogos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2010 08:38:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sacredstones.net/?p=497#comment-345</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a very thought provoking post. I&#039;ll confess up front that I believe the account of creation in Genesis is literal, historical, and a divine revelation. I believe the earth is on the order of 6000 years old. I also believe in science. I&#039;m not talking about philosophy disguised as science. I&#039;m talking about the study of cause-effect relationships to verify or falsify theories. First of all, neither biblical creation nor evolution (cosmic or biological) can be tested scientifically, so both actually fall outside the realm of pure science. Both are beliefs. One purports to be divinely revealed. The other is purely a human invention. That said...

A book I would highly recommend on the subject of astronomy and origins is Starlight and Time by Dr. Russell Humphreys. The theory he puts forward is presented in a way us normal people can easily grasp. He has presented a number of very technical papers since that book was released, but the central idea is essentially good. He explores problems with a number of creationist theories as well as the most popular evolutionist theories (big bang, multiverse, etc).

You present three convictions. Regarding #1, while it is true that one need not have a conviction one way or the other to be saved by the blood of our Lord, it seems to me anyone who faces the question honestly must make a choice between God&#039;s revalation and man&#039;s invention. There are numerous sound theological reasons to reject &quot;old earth&quot; compromise. I will tell you as a matter of personal testimony that after years of research on my own I&#039;ve come to the conclusion that science - that is to say the strict application of scientific method to various models - has led me to believe science soundly supports the plain literal reading of Genesis. Regarding #2, I feel exactly the same way. I&#039;ve studied and written quite a bit on the subject, but I&#039;m not interested in conversing with flamers from either end of the spectrum. Regarding #3 I also fully agree. 

I&#039;m currently in the process of posting an extensive series on the subject of science and creation at http://blogs.bible.org/blog/16486 if you&#039;re interested.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a very thought provoking post. I&#8217;ll confess up front that I believe the account of creation in Genesis is literal, historical, and a divine revelation. I believe the earth is on the order of 6000 years old. I also believe in science. I&#8217;m not talking about philosophy disguised as science. I&#8217;m talking about the study of cause-effect relationships to verify or falsify theories. First of all, neither biblical creation nor evolution (cosmic or biological) can be tested scientifically, so both actually fall outside the realm of pure science. Both are beliefs. One purports to be divinely revealed. The other is purely a human invention. That said&#8230;</p>
<p>A book I would highly recommend on the subject of astronomy and origins is Starlight and Time by Dr. Russell Humphreys. The theory he puts forward is presented in a way us normal people can easily grasp. He has presented a number of very technical papers since that book was released, but the central idea is essentially good. He explores problems with a number of creationist theories as well as the most popular evolutionist theories (big bang, multiverse, etc).</p>
<p>You present three convictions. Regarding #1, while it is true that one need not have a conviction one way or the other to be saved by the blood of our Lord, it seems to me anyone who faces the question honestly must make a choice between God&#8217;s revalation and man&#8217;s invention. There are numerous sound theological reasons to reject &#8220;old earth&#8221; compromise. I will tell you as a matter of personal testimony that after years of research on my own I&#8217;ve come to the conclusion that science &#8211; that is to say the strict application of scientific method to various models &#8211; has led me to believe science soundly supports the plain literal reading of Genesis. Regarding #2, I feel exactly the same way. I&#8217;ve studied and written quite a bit on the subject, but I&#8217;m not interested in conversing with flamers from either end of the spectrum. Regarding #3 I also fully agree. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m currently in the process of posting an extensive series on the subject of science and creation at <a href="http://blogs.bible.org/blog/16486" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.bible.org/blog/16486</a> if you&#8217;re interested.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Michael W. Smith Interview from WorshipIdeas.com by Epheser511</title>
		<link>http://kentsanders.net/2009/10/28/michael-w-smith-interview-from-worshipideas-com/#comment-344</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Epheser511]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 02:18:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sacredstones.net/?p=976#comment-344</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.scribd.com/doc/26838172/Michael-W-Smith-ein-Wolf-im-Schafspelz-Version-1-0]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/26838172/Michael-W-Smith-ein-Wolf-im-Schafspelz-Version-1-0" rel="nofollow">http://www.scribd.com/doc/26838172/Michael-W-Smith-ein-Wolf-im-Schafspelz-Version-1-0</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Desiring God 2010 Conference Promo by Kent Sanders</title>
		<link>http://kentsanders.net/2010/07/30/desiring-god-2010-conference-promo/#comment-335</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kent Sanders]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 03:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kentsanders.net/?p=1361#comment-335</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ingrid - thanks for the additional comments - very helpful!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ingrid &#8211; thanks for the additional comments &#8211; very helpful!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Desiring God 2010 Conference Promo by Ingrid Burling</title>
		<link>http://kentsanders.net/2010/07/30/desiring-god-2010-conference-promo/#comment-331</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ingrid Burling]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 15:45:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kentsanders.net/?p=1361#comment-331</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Regarding your question, have you missed anything in your reading tips/habits? Yes, you have. Here are some more tips for happy reading:

Move your eyes, not your head when reading. Moving your head - which a lot of us do automatically - slows us down and causes neck strain. 

Pause only every few words, rather than on every word. Use Zapreader.com to practice this, and put the setting on 400 words @ 2 words at a time. Each pause you make is 0.27seconds in duration and so even by pausing on every second word you can cut your reading time on 150 pages down by 50% - and then go out to play! 

This technique is all about widening your peripheral vision. The ultimate would be to be able to take in an entire line of text or a page as a single unit - imagine how fast you can get through a book then!

If you really enjoy this, and want to find out how to do that, go on a PhotoReading course. It will blow your mind. I did and have never looked back: these days if I have 90 mins to spare I can go through a 150 page book in 90 mins, completing two sets of notes and be ready to present or use the information in my business. I just love it. 

Finally, remember that speedreading can cause eye strain, so stop every 50 mins or so and do some exercises: rotate your eyes gently clockwise twice, then anti clockwise twice, then move your eyes up and down, left and right several times. Finally, close your eyes and imagine them being sluiced in blue water - this cleanses the eyeballs and helps you to relax. 

Happy Reading!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding your question, have you missed anything in your reading tips/habits? Yes, you have. Here are some more tips for happy reading:</p>
<p>Move your eyes, not your head when reading. Moving your head &#8211; which a lot of us do automatically &#8211; slows us down and causes neck strain. </p>
<p>Pause only every few words, rather than on every word. Use Zapreader.com to practice this, and put the setting on 400 words @ 2 words at a time. Each pause you make is 0.27seconds in duration and so even by pausing on every second word you can cut your reading time on 150 pages down by 50% &#8211; and then go out to play! </p>
<p>This technique is all about widening your peripheral vision. The ultimate would be to be able to take in an entire line of text or a page as a single unit &#8211; imagine how fast you can get through a book then!</p>
<p>If you really enjoy this, and want to find out how to do that, go on a PhotoReading course. It will blow your mind. I did and have never looked back: these days if I have 90 mins to spare I can go through a 150 page book in 90 mins, completing two sets of notes and be ready to present or use the information in my business. I just love it. </p>
<p>Finally, remember that speedreading can cause eye strain, so stop every 50 mins or so and do some exercises: rotate your eyes gently clockwise twice, then anti clockwise twice, then move your eyes up and down, left and right several times. Finally, close your eyes and imagine them being sluiced in blue water &#8211; this cleanses the eyeballs and helps you to relax. </p>
<p>Happy Reading!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Reflections on My 36th Birthday by Kent Sanders</title>
		<link>http://kentsanders.net/2010/07/26/reflections-on-my-36th-birthday/#comment-329</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kent Sanders]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 21:33:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kentsanders.net/?p=1351#comment-329</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks, Lisa. I appreciate the encouragement! Feel free to link to FB or anywhere else - I would feel honored.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Lisa. I appreciate the encouragement! Feel free to link to FB or anywhere else &#8211; I would feel honored.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Reflections on My 36th Birthday by Lisa Womble</title>
		<link>http://kentsanders.net/2010/07/26/reflections-on-my-36th-birthday/#comment-325</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lisa Womble]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 15:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kentsanders.net/?p=1351#comment-325</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You ask if I resonate with any of the statements and I was going to highlight which ones ... but then the list got too long.  Many good thoughts.  Think I&#039;m going to make note on Facebook to let our students know this is one is a &quot;must read.&quot;  Thanks for sharing and Happy Birthday!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You ask if I resonate with any of the statements and I was going to highlight which ones &#8230; but then the list got too long.  Many good thoughts.  Think I&#8217;m going to make note on Facebook to let our students know this is one is a &#8220;must read.&#8221;  Thanks for sharing and Happy Birthday!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Leadership Lessons from Apple&#8217;s iPhone 4 Gaffe, Part 2 by Kent Sanders</title>
		<link>http://kentsanders.net/2010/07/18/leadership-lessons-from-apples-iphone-4-gaffe-part-2/#comment-321</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kent Sanders]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 14:50:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kentsanders.net/?p=1336#comment-321</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hmmm. I don&#039;t know - I think the perception of a problem can become a bigger issue than the actual problem itself. In this case, the fact that Apple was getting a lot of bad press could affect their stock or have other real consequences. Perception can be more powerful than reality.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm. I don&#8217;t know &#8211; I think the perception of a problem can become a bigger issue than the actual problem itself. In this case, the fact that Apple was getting a lot of bad press could affect their stock or have other real consequences. Perception can be more powerful than reality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

